The ammonites were not pacifists meridian magazine. Because the ammonites were not pacifists, these events simply never occurred. Popular pacifism books showing 150 of 279 slaughterhousefive paperback by. To adhere to pacifism, if these examples are any good, is internally inconsistent it amounts to saying, in effect, that saving innocent lives is good but that saving. Pacifism covers a spectrum of views ranging from the belief that international disputes can and should be peacefully resolved. Amanda cawston, pacifism as reappropriated violence philpapers. Integrating literature with philosophy in an innovative way, this unique anthology uses. Cssj working paper sj029 november 2014 2 narvesons article appeared in 1965, halfway through between the cuban missiles. Theological contexts of just war theory and pacifism.
Walzers book says nothing about these issues ryan 2015 ryan, c. Ideal for introductory ethics courses, the moral life. Pacifism is the opposition to war or violence as a means of settling disputes. A more subtle version of this argument has been articulated by jan narveson narveson 1965 who argued that pacifism involves an internal contradiction that is related to the idea of justice and human rights. Jan narveson 1992 journal of philosophical research 17. A philosophical analysis jan narveson several different doctrines have been called pacifism, and it is impossible to say anything cogent about it without saying which of them one has in mind. This may possibly become the longoverdue book on this very. Lewis vaughn taking a unique approach that emphasizes careful reasoning, this cuttingedge reader is structured around twentyseven landmark arguments that have provoked heated debates on current ethical issues. Princeton university press, 1989 which also strongly advocates a certain kind of pacifism to which i will return and jan narveson, pacifism. All were used as teaching books in courses or seminars. Although it is common to believe that the ammonites were pacifists, the report of their story demonstrates that this is a mistake. Facts and figures, public opinion, legalities, and time lines a list of key terms at the end of each chapter. In a world riven with conflict, violence and war, this book proposes a philosophical defense of pacifism.
A philosophical analysis, in war and morality, richard a. Euthanasia and christian vision, gilbert meilaender. A read is counted each time someone views a publication summary such as the title, abstract, and list of authors, clicks on a figure, or views or downloads the fulltext. Being honest in justwar thinking000 the doctrine of. Jan narveson currently works at the philosophy retired, university of waterloo. I would like to thank a referee for philosophical studies for helpful comments that i used in revising the paper. The essays in this collection share a consistent theme running through much of narvesons moral and political philosophy, namely that politics and morals stem from the interests of individual people, and have no antecedent authority over us.
Jan does research in social and political philosophy, applied philosophy and. In this book, coady reexamines a range of urgent problems pertinent to political violence against the background of a contemporary approach to just war thinking. Pacifists reject the violent presuppositions of a society based upon power, strength, nationalism, and the system of militarized nationstates. Respecting persons in theory and practice is a collection of essays of the moral and political philosophy of jan narveson. But while jan narvesons you and the state is certainly something of a polemic, it still serves as a pretty good introduction to the field of political philosophy. Defending pacifism against the charge that it is naively utopian, transformative pacifism offers a critical theory of the existing world order, and points in the direction of concrete ethical and political action. Pacifism is the opposition to war or violence as a means of settling disputes or gaining advantage. The following saw many years of service in my courses. The discovery that people far away are in bad shape seems to generate a sense of guilt on the part of many articulate people in our part of the world, even though they are no worse off now that weve heard about them than they had been before. Our duties to animals george orwell, shooting an elephant peter singer, animal liberation. Contemporary moral arguments incorporates more pedagogical features than any other reader, including.
See thomas nagel, war and massacre in his mortal questions canto edition, cambridge. Under the terms of this moral imaginary, the meaning of pacifism is. All animals are equal carl cohen, the case against animal rights. Reviewed by jan narveson, university of waterloo in this new book, larry may develops and defends what he claims is a special and new outlook on war. I must begin by making it clear, then, that i am limiting the discussion of pacifism to a rather narrow band of doctrines, further distinc. An apocalyptic warning from the book of mormon, in hugh nibley, the prophetic book of mormon, ed. The first major anthology to survey the field of moral and ethical issues concerning war and peace, this text traces debates from cicero and augustine to kosovo and iraq today.
As jan narveson once put this, pacifists have too many friends. All references to sections and page numbers are to this article, unless otherwise noted. Elizabeth anscombe views it as a corrupting illusion elizabeth anscombe, war and. Some commentators on the most nonviolent forms of pacifism, including jan narveson, argue that such pacifism is a selfcontradictory doctrine. Pacifists are unwilling to use violence to defend against aggression because they respect life or respect persons. Suppose you agree with narveson that pacifism is not a viable position. Objections to the institutionalization of euthanasia, stephen g. Pacifism covers a spectrum of views ranging from the belief that international disputes can and should be peacefully resolved, to absolute opposition to the use of violence, or even force, under any circumstances. The just war argument against terrorism haig khatchadourian. Contemporary moral arguments paperback lewis vaughn. Narveson claims that everyone has rights and corresponding responsibilities not to violate others rights.
This is a book that will challenge the serious reader, indeed. Coady brings a philosophical and ethical perspective as he places the problems of war and political violence in the frame of reflective ethics. Of all published articles, the following were the most read within the past 12 months. Selections from martha minow, between vengeance and forgiveness 1999.
Jan narveson phd philosoph harvard, 1961 university. The readings are just the right length to cover in class and the variety of sources, including some literature and nonacademic writing, makes the philosophy accessibleand relevant. I will try to defend the importance of pacifism as an integral part of war as such, pacifism as a requisite of war ought to. Jan does research in social and political philosophy, applied philosophy and ethics. A philosophical analysis 000 stanley hauerwas, pacifism.
Pacifism is a transformative philosophy with wide ranging implications. Narveson responds to this pacifist option by arguing that this is a moral principle that too few people share to form the basis for an effective public morality. A philosophical analysis is an unusually thorough, careful treatment with some rather surprising tentative conclusions about terrorism and secession. Of all the attitudes and theories associated with or identified as pacifism, only the doctrine that everyone ought not to resist violence with force is of philosophical interest, and it is logically incoherent. Such prudential pacifism is based upon costbenefit analyses focused on. Contents may have variations from the printed book or be incomplete or contain other coding. Appreciating the ammonites nonpacifism helps us think more clearly about them, and it also explains several features of the text. Its organization and layout are fantastic, and i like the diversity of applied ethics issues covered in the final section. His belief is not only that violence is evil but that it is morally wrong to use force to resist, punish, or prevent violence. Ask your ancestors and they will tell you, rabbi daniel a. A philosophical analysis haig khatchadourian, the morality of terrorism andrew valls, can terrorism be justified.
The moral life would be ideal for any ethics or moral philosophy course. Essay questionsideal for writing assignmentsafter each of the. Pacifism and the credibility of the just war tradition. Narveson responds by offering examples from history of instances where, he believes, an absence of violent resistance cost more innocent lives than violent resistance would have. Generally, when one says that a book marketed as an introduction is biased, that is a bad thing. Students like the variety of the readings and the affordable price. Pacifism is opposition to war, militarism or violence.
Jan narveson is distinguished professor emeritus of philosophy. Corlett goes in for careful analysis, and doesnt flinch at conclusions that might be unwelcome to some. He is also president of the institute for liberal studies. I will select three out of any number of texts by narveson. If it takes too long to load the home page, tap on the button below. Excellent philosophical treatments of a pacifist position can be found in richard holmes, on war and morality princeton. Pacifism covers a spectrum of views, including the belief that international disputes can and should be peacefully resolved, calls for the abolition of the institutions of the military and war, opposition to any organization of society through governmental force anarchist or libertarian pacifism, rejection of the use of physical violence to obtain political, economic or social. Andy sanford, southwestern michigan college the moral life is a highquality and reasonably priced introduction to the study of ethics. They were a group of lamanites converted by the sons of mosiah, who, following their conversion, buried their weapons in the earth, entered a covenant to eschew all conflict, and took upon themselves the name antinephilehies. In this chapter, i introduce a novel conception of pacifism. Wassertrom war and morality, wadsworth publishing co.
A related term is ahimsa to do no harm, which is a core philosophy in indian religions such as hinduism, buddhism, and jainism. The cold warin which the united states and the ussr did not shed each others bloodwas still. Issues of selfdefense, preemptive war, torture, pacifism, terrorism, and many more are central to the readings in this book. On the alleged inconsistency, moral insensitivity and fanaticism. Georgia united states supreme court the just war joseph mckenna war and murder g. A philosophical examination1 cecile fabre all souls college, oxford cecile. It then focuses on what a commitment to pacifism and nonviolence means in terms of a variety of practical issues. Henry david thoreau, on the duty of civil disobedience. Jan narveson phd philosoph harvard, 1961 university of. Jan narveson is distinguished professor emeritus of the university of waterloo in ontario, canada, and president of the kitchenerwaterloo chamber music society. Revisiting just war theory, cambridge university press, 2015, 272pp.
Some philosophical considerations000 john howard yoder, when war is unjust. Pacifism s popularity rests on confusions about what the doctrine really is. That is why this definition is emphasized by ceadel and orend as well as by nagel, anscombe, narveson, mcmahan, and others. Ethical and political theory, applied ethics education. An introductory reader in ethics and literature, sixth edition, brings together an extensive and varied collection of eightyeight classical and contemporary readings on ethical theory and practice. It argues that there is a moral presumption against war and unless that presumption is defeated, war is unjustified. Jul 16, 20 it is my intention to attempt to define pacifism, in its engagement and concept, as a necessary requisite of war and military action, following a phrase used over a hundred years ago by franz rosenzweig when speaking of pacifism as necessary equipment of war. Jan narveson asks the provocative, philosophical question. Essay questionsideal for writing assignmentsafter each of the twentyseven argument sections four types of boxes throughout. Taking a unique approach that emphasizes careful reasoning, this cuttingedge reader is structured. The remaining positions are those of the just war theorist and the just war skeptic. Any contemporary relevance of pacifism, by contrast, has been in the domain of moral philosophy. Taking into consideration all these positions, one can see that pacifism has branched out too far.
1370 1164 206 99 1042 376 1331 527 569 1313 652 459 746 531 453 502 165 201 376 1072 1355 283 821 796 425 1181 299 605 1055 591 505 701 1018 1437 1105